Who doesn't work hard? Are you the only one who's tired? "" Do we need to talk about it again? "... Similar words may seem like a casual remark of" rushing to talk ", but there is impatience and distrust hidden between the lines, casting a shadow over the communication that should have been full of trust. A good word brings warmth to the three winters, while a bad word hurts the cold of June. Habitual rhetorical questions may not seem like intense arguments, but they are more uncomfortable than arguments; Not direct criticism, but more unbearable than criticism, can easily leave an indelible barrier in the hearts of officers and soldiers. The key to leading troops is to lead the heart. Smooth and efficient communication between officers and soldiers is the emotional bond of cohesion and centripetal force in the army. A word of encouragement full of trust can ignite the torch of struggle in a soldier's heart, while a rhetorical question with a gun and a stick may extinguish a passionate heart. When soldiers muster the courage to express their fatigue, confusion, or thoughts, what they crave is the listening, understanding, and guidance of their leaders, rather than being blocked or denied by a single sentence. Over time, if soldiers are unwilling to say anything, reluctant to express their grievances, and afraid to speak up when faced with difficulties, trust will quietly dissipate through repeated 'rhetorical questions'. Behind the habitual rhetorical questions is often not malicious, but rather stems from the loss of control over the emotional management of the soldiers themselves, the simplicity of their work methods, and the habitual thinking of "I tell you, you listen". Soldiers should realize that a sentence they blurt out carries a heavy weight in the hearts of soldiers. Habitual rhetorical questions ignore the specific situation and feelings of the communication partner, close the channel of empathy, and build a high wall of estrangement. Managing troops and advancing work cannot be separated from strict requirements, but strictness does not mean strictness, let alone harsh language or indifferent attitude. The art of leading troops is often hidden in the warmth of a single sentence. Conversation is not just a lecture, equality is the first principle of conversation. The key to dismantling the 'wall of rhetorical questions' lies in putting oneself in others' shoes and empathizing with others. When facing complaints or questions from soldiers, it is advisable to patiently understand the emotions and needs behind the words. A concern of 'where do you feel the most difficult to train?' and a helping remark of 'let's figure out this problem together' are far more warm and effective in solving problems than a rhetorical question. Words are the voice of the heart, words warm the hearts of soldiers. To create a united, friendly, harmonious, and pure internal relationship, it is necessary to start with using language cautiously and habitually asking questions. Soldiers should put aside their airs, always have empathy, treat each other with more equal respect and honesty, use more exploratory and peaceful language, provide more brotherly care and reminders, learn the art of communication, truly speak to the hearts of officers and soldiers, and make every conversation an opportunity to enhance trust and unite soldiers. (Looking into the New Era)