According to the WeChat official account news of "Shi Shuo Xin Yu", in order to fight the blue sky defense war and protect the safety of people's lives and property, the market supervision department actively cooperated with the ecological environment, public security and other departments to severely punish the counterfeiting of motor vehicle inspection, and revoked the qualifications of a number of illegal institutions in accordance with the law. Some typical cases are now announced. In July 2025, Hebei Zhangbei Zhongren Motor Vehicle Testing Co., Ltd. issued a false emission inspection report case. Based on the case clues and relevant materials transferred by Zhangjiakou Ecological Environment Bureau, the Hebei Provincial Market Supervision Bureau lawfully launched an investigation into Zhangbei Zhongren Motor Vehicle Testing Co., Ltd. The Ecological Environment Bureau of Zhangjiakou City has clearly identified in the transfer letter that the company has engaged in illegal behavior of issuing false emission inspection reports, which meets the serious circumstances stipulated in Article 112 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China, and recommends the revocation of its qualification certificate for inspection and testing institutions. In July 2025, the Market Supervision Bureau of Hebei Province, in accordance with Article 27 of the "Supervision and Administration Measures for Inspection and Testing Institutions" and Article 112 (1) of the "Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China", imposed an administrative penalty on the company by revoking its qualification certificate for inspection and testing institutions in accordance with the law. In February 2025, Shanghai Minhang Motor Vehicle Testing Service Co., Ltd. issued a false emission inspection report case. Based on the clues transferred by the Shanghai Ecology and Environment Bureau, the Shanghai Minhang District Market Supervision Bureau lawfully launched an investigation into Shanghai Minhang Motor Vehicle Testing Service Co., Ltd. The company engaged in fraudulent behavior during the emission testing of 41 motor vehicles from June to August 2024, in violation of Article 54 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China. In December 2024, the Shanghai Ecology and Environment Bureau imposed administrative penalties on the company for issuing false emission inspection reports in accordance with Article 112 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China. Based on the "Opinions of the Market Supervision Bureau of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment on the Criteria for Determining the Severity of Motor Vehicle Emission Inspection Institutions Falsifying Emission Inspection Results or Issuing False Emission Inspection Reports" and the "Administrative Penalty Discretionary Rules for Ecological Environment in the Yangtze River Delta Region", it was determined that the company's illegal behavior met the serious circumstances and the relevant case clues were transferred to the Shanghai Market Supervision Bureau. In May 2025, the Market Supervision Bureau of Minhang District, Shanghai, imposed an administrative penalty of revoking the inspection qualification of the company in accordance with Article 112 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China. In January 2025, Huaiyuan Modern Motor Vehicle Inspection Co., Ltd. in Anhui Province issued a false motor vehicle inspection report. Based on the clues transferred by the Ecology and Environment Bureau of Bengbu City, the Market Supervision Bureau of Bengbu City lawfully launched an investigation into Huaiyuan Modern Motor Vehicle Inspection Co., Ltd. The company violated Article 54 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China by using methods such as "OBD interference meters" to falsify emissions testing on 80 motor vehicles from May to July 2024. In January 2025, the Ecology and Environment Bureau of Bengbu City imposed administrative penalties on the company for issuing false emission inspection reports in accordance with Article 112 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China. Based on the provisions of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China and the Anhui Province Ecological Environment Administrative Penalty Discretionary Standards, the bureau determined that its illegal behavior met the serious circumstances and transferred the relevant case clues to the Bengbu City Market Supervision Bureau. In June 2025, the Market Supervision Bureau of Bengbu City imposed an administrative penalty of revoking the inspection qualification of the company in accordance with Article 112 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China. In October 2024, Guangzhou Jiulong Motor Vehicle Inspection Co., Ltd. issued a false motor vehicle inspection report case. Based on the clues transferred by the Guangzhou Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Detachment, the Huangpu District Market Supervision Bureau of Guangzhou lawfully launched an investigation into Guangzhou Jiulong Motor Vehicle Inspection Co., Ltd. After investigation, the company found that during the safety technical inspection of four motor vehicles from July to September 2024, it engaged in fraud by forging, altering original data, records, and other means. In February 2025, the Market Supervision Bureau of Huangpu District, Guangzhou City, imposed an administrative penalty on the company in accordance with Article 94 (2) of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, imposing a fine and revoking its inspection qualification. In June 2024, Guangdong Hongjing Motor Vehicle Inspection Co., Ltd. issued a false motor vehicle inspection and testing report. Based on the clues transferred by the Guangzhou Public Security Bureau Traffic Police Detachment, the Huadu District Market Supervision Bureau of Guangzhou launched an investigation into Guangdong Hongjing Motor Vehicle Inspection Co., Ltd. After investigation, the company found that during the inspection of two motor vehicles from April to May 2024, it engaged in fraud by using prop tires, exchanging inspection tires, and forging original inspection data. In May 2025, the Market Supervision Bureau of Huadu District, Guangzhou, in accordance with Article 94 (2) of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China, imposed a fine and revoked the inspection qualification of the company in accordance with the law. In May 2025, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Quanzhou County Tongda Motor Vehicle Testing Co., Ltd. issued a false motor vehicle emission inspection report. Based on the case clues transferred by Guilin Ecological Environment Bureau, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Market Supervision Bureau launched an investigation into Quanzhou County Tongda Motor Vehicle Testing Co., Ltd. The company violated Article 54 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China by manipulating the engine control unit information of 254 motor vehicles, using the same software calibration identification code (CAL ID) and verification code (CVN) instead of different batches of vehicle OBD information during emission testing from January to October 2024; In February 2025, the Guilin Ecological Environment Bureau imposed administrative penalties on the company in accordance with Article 112 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China. In March 2025, the Guilin Ecology and Environment Bureau, based on the "Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Ecological Environment Non fine Administrative Penalty Discretionary Rules", determined that his illegal behavior met the serious circumstances and transferred the relevant case clues to the Guilin Market Supervision Bureau. In August 2025, the Market Supervision Bureau of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region imposed an administrative penalty of revoking the inspection qualification of the institution in accordance with Article 112 (1) of the Air Pollution Prevention and Control Law of the People's Republic of China. In November 2024, according to the notification from the Lanzhou Traffic Police Detachment, the Gansu Provincial Market Supervision Bureau launched an investigation into Lanzhou Huajun Motor Vehicle Testing Co., Ltd. for issuing a false motor vehicle safety technical inspection report. After investigation, the company conducted a "no vehicle annual inspection" from July 2023 to March 2024 by repeatedly changing the chassis number, changing the mold vehicle license plate, and some appearance features of the same vehicle, and issued false motor vehicle safety technical inspection reports for 793 heavy-duty flatbed semi trailers. In March 2024, the Lanzhou Public Security Bureau initiated an investigation into the parties involved. In April 2024, the Xigu District People's Court of Lanzhou City ruled that the parties were guilty of providing false certification documents. In March 2025, the Market Supervision Bureau of Gansu Province issued an administrative penalty to revoke the inspection qualification of the institution in accordance with Article 94 (2) of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China. In November 2024, the Market Supervision Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region launched an investigation into Xinjiang Avenue Xiyu Motor Vehicle Inspection Co., Ltd. for issuing a false motor vehicle safety technical inspection report in accordance with the law. After investigation, it was found that in September 2024, the company engaged in fraud by changing the vehicle license plate number and other methods during the motor vehicle safety technical inspection. The Traffic Police Detachment of Urumqi Public Security Bureau has imposed a fine of 1500 yuan on the company for issuing false motor vehicle safety technical inspection reports in accordance with Article 94 (2) of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China. In July 2025, the Market Supervision Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region imposed an administrative penalty on the institution to revoke its inspection qualification in accordance with Article 94 (2) of the Road Traffic Safety Law of the People's Republic of China. (New Society)